Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the average revenue of qualified workers in comparison of other careers particularly sports players and celebrities, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although these professional settlers have the right of earning the high revenue and it is beneficial as it regarded by a substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that they should earn more than other jobs due to their contribution and other benefits which present to society.
From a social standpoint, an array of inhabitants argued that the skilled workers who have demanding jobs should have more income because they can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of the big responsibilities. Doctors and nurses are dealing directly with the human life, and have their risk and responsibilities are very high. In addition, they spent the tough time to acquire their knowledge. Also, teachers should boost their interpersonal, oral and written skills for instructing the youths and play a pivotal role in their upbringing. Undoubtedly, the role of these occupations is vital and they should have this right to have an appropriate income.
There is no doubt sportsmen or women and celebrities have wellbeing jobs because of their popularity. The media is one of the most significant factors of creating this feature. These citizens can easily grab everybody's attention by the power of fantastic programs, Internet, magazines and newspapers. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university has asserted that due to the universal interest of sports and cinema, a great deal amount of money is spent annually in them. Hence, sports players and artists are quite rich.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the professions should have wellbeing jobs
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-07 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2018-05-07 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think? What are the advantages and disadvantage es of this phenomenon? 77
- Can the internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 88
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- Climate change is a major concern for governments all around the world. If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subjects will you choose? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...right of earning the high revenue and it is beneficial as it regarded by a substa...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
... because of their popularity. The media is one of the most significant factors of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44480519481 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04845579416 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8653250459 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783731995387 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242548961604 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254308929648 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400095393512 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302882412006 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.