In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion?
These days there are universities and schools which group students based on their academic abilities and this results in heated debate. Grouping of students have advantages and disadvantages which I will be discussing in this essay and will provide my point of view.
At the outset, myriad of arguments can be attributed to the importance of grouping the students based on score achieved. For instance, if bright students are kept in one group and weaker students are kept in other group than weaker students might not grow as high as it should be, since the IQ level of weaker students is almost the same. However, if all level of students are mixed together than this might uplift weaker students since there are students who help peers while studying and also encourage weaker section of the class students to perform better.
On the other hand, students who are intelligent are mixed with incompetent students, and this might degrade the performance of bright students as teacher has to wait for all students to understand the concept of the subject that teacher is discussing in the classroom.
In conclusion, I feel that students should be grouped based on their academic capabilities so that progress can be seen in all students rather then specific set of students.
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs Current crucial problems faced by human 95
- Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or disagree 72
- In developing countries, tourism has advantages and disadvantages. 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ress can be seen in all students rather then specific set of students.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0234741784 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6259538424 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 139.433497537 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0517795575 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.857142857 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 20.9669160288 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5714285714 7.25397266985 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198671659801 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109784267405 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456814545521 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129947654289 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357928215336 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.