some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
These days, the intensive extension of the internet leading to the emergence of new educational methods which display the tradition. In my perspective, the drawbacks are inexorable, however, it is a potential and efficient approaching.
In the one hand, by utilizing the online educational system has its disadvantages. Firstly, the students frequently spontaneous to study when they face the computer’s screen. They effortlessly unfocus to others activities involves video games, web surfing, etc. Secondly, the lecturers are immensely difficult arduous to control the quality of their lecture contents leading to the lack of interaction because they indirectly conduct the students. This subjective problem may trigger the depression in learners whereas they are in the incomprehensible status.
In the other hand, learning through the online method can maximum curtail the disadvantages of traditional systems and tremendously benefits to the people who useful utilize it. The undeniable advantages of this system are the comfort in the time when employing this formality. Instead of wasting the effort to go to school, learning at home is more comfortable and flexible. Besides, the transport cost can considerably mitigate because the students need not pay money for public transportation. Furthermore, with the boundlessness of Internet knowledge, the students can easily research the relative information about the disciplines in order to immediately contact the teachers. By themselves exploration, students can enlarge the multifariousness and plenty of knowledge and memorize them easier than be provided with the available information.
In conclusion, though there are some drawbacks of courses delivered on websites, I believe this online
studying method is revolutionary in contemporary tertiary education systems
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | ghikar | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | tunglt6596 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | tung6596 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | Iraj | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Jenny Trang Nguyen | 84 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Task 2: Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational values. Discuss both views and give your oppinion. 78
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...y face the computer's screen. They effortlessly unfocus to others activities involves video gam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a useful'.
Suggestion: who is a useful
...and tremendously benefits to the people who useful utilize it. The undeniable advantages o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91353383459 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33409478366 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.304100063 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0797685928058 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261277802679 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047333104693 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614795895556 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091437901612 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.