Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
In the current era, number of beggar's count has increased significantly. Some of them, even though looks physically fine, chooses to beg for money and satiate their hunger. I completely am not in favour of giving money to the beggars, because I believe providing free money to beggars can potentially encourage many illegal crimes.
First of all, I believe that giving money to the beggars encourages them to do it more. Sometimes, physically fit, but pauper would consider this as an easy way to earn money than working hard for it. For example, walking by the road, we can find so many beggars who are young and without any disabilities, carry a kid, sing gloomy songs and ask for money. This clearly shows that they prefer doing so as a light way to fill their stomach than actually toil for it.
Additionally, helping beggars with money bolster the human traffickers to kidnap small kid or even young people sometimes and take out one of their eyes and force them to ask for money on the streets. This is because people sympathize with blind kids or even adults. One of the movie Slumdog millioner, which depicts the real nature of the world-how the small kids are trafficked and used to beg for money can be used as an example for showcasing the bitter truth.
I believe the we, as a whole nation, should do something for people who are real poor, left out and disabled. This may involve teaching them how to earn their living with the acceptance of the misery. Begging is never an option. It can only contribute to fraudulence. Hence, it should be prohibited.
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they challenge points made in the reading. 3
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 42
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contradict points made in the reading passage 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...owcasing the bitter truth. I believe the we, as a whole nation, should do something...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70652173913 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50337673654 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0071693264 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241376236069 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763989809522 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632271418039 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146627027892 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524349326572 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.