The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2025
The linear graph highlights the energy consumed and produced in US from year 1950 to 2000 and at same time it foretells the trends for 2025. The data is calibrated in units of quadrillion of BTU(British Thermal Units).
It can be seen that, the usage of energy which was 25 quadrillion units in 1950 had raised and reached 95 quadrillion units within 50 years till 2000. In between this imports had been took place. Additionally, it was estimated that; an upsurge will continue during upcoming 25 years, without any downward trend.
Apart from all this, as the graph demonstrates the production of energy; comperatively more stablised. In the year 1975, production started from 25 and upsurged till1950 by 60 quadrillion units. Furthermore, from year 1975 to 2000, it had shown fluctuating trend as well as climbed steadily by 5 quadrillion units. It is predicted that, within 2025, production of energy will be upsurged upto 80 quadrillion units, hence shows upward trend.
Overall, it is evident that, with the tremendous incline in level of energy consumed; imports has been taken place whereas in production there were no imports required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-11 | Jashandeepkaur | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-11 | Jashandeepkaur | 84 | view |
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2025 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these forces affected three regions of the world during 1990. 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of silkworm and stages in the production of silk cloth. 90
- The tables show the population density in 6 countries and the increasing rate of urban population in 2008 38
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2025 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s within 50 years till 2000. In between this imports had been took place. Additional...
^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
... 2000. In between this imports had been took place. Additionally, it was estimated t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... downward trend. Apart from all this, as the graph demonstrates the production...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, well, whereas, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12234042553 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78708684848 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7793041909 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193815742279 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789415624402 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794825148571 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123430969072 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759887415448 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.