The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus.
The author of the issue highlights that leaders in any given nation should keep track of common ground and reasonable consensus than elusive ideal. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular salient to which I vehemently cling is that prosperity of the nation should be the first priority of politics in the society owing to the fact that it helps a society push forward and flourished. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, politics in any society play a consequential role owing to the fact that the destiny of the society is in their hands. Not only can they help the society make a progress day in day out but also they can bend over backward and try hard to build a thriving society. Broadly speaking, common grounds and reasonable consensus will provide an opportunity for the society not falling behind owing to the fact that they are the major duty of the politics to share their ideas and come to an agreement. As a tangible example, when a country is in crisis or is invaded by foreigners, it is incumbent upon politics to follow reasonable grounds and consensus to save the country and repel any threat. So, it is necessarily needed to make sound decisions and come to an agreement to choose the best way. To elucidate more on this issue, politics should be loyal to their country and put their efforts so as to make a prosperous country. In this way, not only can people trust them but also people could encourage them to keep on their career successfully.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that if politics follow common ground and reasonable consensus, indeed, they spread trustworthy and integrity throughout the society. If we take a minute to ponder over it, politics should take people's ideas and opinions into consideration in order to gain respect. In fact, without the support of people, hardly can politics make a progress. So, although people's ideas might not be applicable and meticulous, at least people will trust politics in any realm. The willingness and ability to trust people that you look up is absolutely essential for you to perform at your very best. It can be deduced from a combination of coverage and depth of detail that with trustworthy and integrity you have nothing to hide, so, you have nothing to fear. This attitude not only can help people broaden their horizon but also can entice politics to work honestly and take veracity, fidelity, aspiration, and expectation into account.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, follow common grounds and reasonable consensus might not always work properly. In fact, politics need to become familiar with various ideas and opinions in order to be able to measure every positive and negative consequence of a situation. So, elusive ideal could foster disagreements and help politics to become acquainted with myriads of ideas. In this case, politics will be able to make right decisions by taking any condition into account. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds than can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-11 | amirbahman | 62 | view |
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used the public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in populari 69
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 73
- Some people spend their entire lives in one place. Other moves a number of times throughout their lives. Which do you prefer? 76
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In d 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to their country and put their efforts so as to make a prosperous country. In this way,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ort of people, hardly can politics make a progress. So, although peoples ideas might not b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...ity to trust people that you look up is absolutely essential for you to perform at your very best. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, honestly, however, if, look, so, as to, at least, broadly speaking, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2836.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94076655052 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74569323786 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466898954704 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0076458319 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.44 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.96 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.12 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281934332638 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791486473166 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680024640965 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160328332085 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473284437823 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.