Television has had a significant influence on the culture of many societies. To what extent do you think it has positively or negatively affected cultural development?
The recent upsurge in the use of television has posted a crucial controversy over the feasible damage to many countries’ culture. In my opinion, despite several abominable effects on features of communities, television is truly the source of knowledge for citizens.
On the one hand, television has undoubtedly been offering deplorable consequences concerning with culture of a society. Firstly, exotic and inappropriate traditions from abroad can be adopted which could possibly cause many injuries to a country’ culture. For example, compared to the past when almost all traditional days in Vietnam stem from the local community, people now more enjoy oversea customs such as Christmas Day or Valentine Day leading to degrading characteristics of its country. Moreover, distorted information on telecasts may mislead viewers, which not only exacerbate the belief of local citizens but also damage the reputation of a country.
On the other hand, Television, from my standpoint, still presents more satisfactory impacts on developing communities characteristics. Television, initially, impart knowledge about different cultures to a huge number of viewers. In particular, youngsters receive the biggest assistance from utilizing it because of updating the newest information on the world such as scholarships or occupations. Furthermore, outmoded cultural practices might be exposed thanks to television news, and, as a result, they would definitely be eradicated. This aids the cultural development of a nation.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that the deleterious impacts of television, I am still convinced that it brings more benefits than harms to communities in terms of culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-12 | Fatheranddaughter | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...itions from abroad can be adopted which could possibly cause many injuries to a country' ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83333333333 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35570722428 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7437146424 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125673547183 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520780181298 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549189835492 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647339577897 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492288258784 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.