The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affeccted three regions of the world during the 1990

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affeccted three regions of the world during the 1990

The circular pie chart depicts that the four major causes of degradation , and the tabular chart reveals the three regions of the world during the year in 1990 The data is calibrated in given percentage.
It can be seen that in the causes of worldwide land degradation the over-cultivation was approximately less than third. Nextly, people cut the plants and trees for their uses in daily life. It is main cause of deforestation which is less than third. The overgrazing on land was more than third, and the other on land was approximately more than one in twenty
Having a quick glance upon the table chart.The Europe region was highest in the three region that was 23%. In the stage the land is polluted in all stage. The North America was only 5%, and the Ocenia region the total land degrated is only 13%.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing activity is the major cause of land deagradation compare to the other three of the main reasons especially in Europe region

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-22 Anureet kaur 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat the four major causes of degradation , and the tabular chart reveals the three...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ata is calibrated in given percentage. It can be seen that in the causes of wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately more than one in twenty Having a quick glance upon the table cha...
^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ing a quick glance upon the table chart.The Europe region was highest in the three ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7134502924 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62708363311 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1981460737 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255413529474 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106343739518 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718778319551 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16181225796 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052047733124 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.