Give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn’t have any effect of his bad neighbourhood.
The effect of bad neighbourhood on a person's accomplishment, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of bad neighbourhood on person's accomplishment has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the achievement of one's success over the years. It can be said that eventually, unwanted neighbourhood, difficult circumstances, inevitable situations never impact the underlying belief of becoming successful. This essay will elaborate how bad neighbourhood inspired him to become successful and how it educated him to deal with the hardship.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why bad neighbourhood didn't impact on one's success, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that person has been influenced positively by the bad elements of the society and sorrows and sufferings, which his neighourhood endured, have stimulated his personality to avoid the similar destiny by achieving success in life. For example, person resided in a neighbourhood where jail term was inevitable due to drug dealings, however, these inspired him to take a different path to avoid the same fate
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that person learnt how to deal with the hardship of life while living in the corrupt neighbourhood which in turns created a strong personality to deal with the similar situations in life, but it also paved the way for him to become accomplished. For example, not only was he moved by the poverty and how it can lead to crime, but also learnt how hard work can help to avoid wrong doings and help him earn money.
From what has been discussed above, it can be said that the impact of bad neighbourhood on success was prominent, and the way it prepares him for the difficulties.
- Some people claim that digital age has made us lazier, others claim it has made us more knowledgeable. Discuss both ideas 85
- Give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn’t have any effect of his bad neighbourhood. 77
- Do you think English will remain global language despite globalization?The importance of English language worldwide, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of English language has sparked the controversy o 85
- Some people think that music promotes children s learning There are mixed results on the impact of music generated from researchers To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- Does video conferencing with doctor help patients to cure any disease discuss the pros and cons?The importance of video conferencing which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of video conferencing has sparked 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
The effect of bad neighbourhood on a persons accomplishment, which was always debata...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ntial influence of bad neighbourhood on persons accomplishment has sparked the controve...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...act of this trend on the achievement of ones success over the years. It can be said ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... numerous reasons why bad neighbourhood didnt impact on ones success, but the most co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17123287671 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14765339563 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530821917808 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.5024630542 176% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.219261568 50.4703680194 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.75 104.977214359 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5 20.9669160288 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195077848055 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981843301592 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635023602008 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125692294554 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06389090844 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 12.6369458128 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.9458128079 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.3980295567 158% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.