Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
The upshot of the given issue has multiple viewpoints and create a controversial situation. The issue provides different views of diff people and we can't generalize it to a base conclusion. I think it's an agree to disagree issue and both the sides has its own pros and cons. In my opinion, the officials should take their own decisions which are good for the people and satisfy them completely.
Firstly, the government officials have experience and training which makes them capable of taking their own decisions. This is because the officials are chosen and made government officials by long training and scrutiny process. They are put in different situations and asked to carry out their own decisions in these situations. This makes them capable to take decisions in all possible situations and qualifies them to be named as excellent officials. Moreover, the officials are also taught about sentiment analysis and how to get to a point where a majority of the people would like the way he/she has interpreted the situation. And hence, the officials are capable enough of taking their own decisions for people's good.
Secondly, if the officials are asked to serve the people according to their will then it might create some problems. People have different thinking and might not agree upon a single conclusion. Moreover, people are not trained to understand the circumstances and surroundings to take the optimal decisions as that of the officials. It might happen that major conflict of ideas on a certain topic may create another issue that officials might have to deal with. For example, while deciding whether to build a musjid or a Hindu temple on a place owned by the government will create a great dispute. In this case, the officials would be the ideal person to decide what is to be done.
Undeniably, the official's decision might also go wrong and might not satisfy the people's will. This is true but not in all the cases. It might happen in a case where the official is a rookie and might end up with bad decisions. but this situation could be properly handled by appointing some other experienced official. Moreover, it is also true that the officials have opted to work for the people and by the people. However, as stated above, officials are trained to overcome this. And hence, officials decisions are taken completely taking all the cases into consideration and getting to a point where everyone is satisfied.
Thus, by believing in the official's judgment is what the people can to as these officials are voted to their positions by the people themselves. The officials know their responsibilities and would surely work for people's good. In the end, it is all about trust that the people show in the officials and that is what going to provide a solution to the given issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | JOINUL ISLAM | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company."Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different constructio 63
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them the sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment. 50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant number of their citizens are hungry or unemployed 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s different views of diff people and we cant generalize it to a base conclusion. I t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ralize it to a base conclusion. I think its an agree to disagree issue and both the...
^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ze it to a base conclusion. I think its an agree to disagree issue and both the sides ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ie and might end up with bad decisions. but this situation could be properly handle...
^^^
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
...satisfied. Thus, by believing in the officials judgment is what the people can to as t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9012605042 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69245044925 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441176470588 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0346915535 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7307692308 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442648439415 0.243740707755 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125120770322 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991085155058 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257088064232 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707201352215 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.