Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Most of the animal species are at the verge of extinction worldwide. Many environmental factors has contributed to their extinction, however some people are trying to save them from getting extinct, which involves the usage of several resources. Many consider it as a waste of valuable resources. This essay will discuss the reasons why saving the animal from extinction is not a waste of valuable resources before concluding.
Our planet comprises of both flora and fauna, which makes our ecosystem to work in a balanced way. The animal species which are on the verge of extinction, are too a part of this ecosystem and without them it will be imbalanced. For instance, by the extinction of one species the whole food chain get disturbed and as a result the other species may likewise get affected. Thus, to keep our ecosystem to work in a proper manner, we should always try hard to save such species which are about to disappear.
In addition, at some point of time we humans are further getting affected by their vanish. Human activities have led to their disappearance by devastating their natural habitats. So there will be no wastage of valuable resources occur by virtue of we are responsible for their extinction. For example, we have constructed building by cutting the forests, a habitat for them. Thus, if these animals will not survive, we humans too will not live long.
This essay discussed how saving the animals from extinction is a means to save our ecosystem rather than wastage of valuable resources. In my opinion, all animals are part of out ecosystem and they deserve to be saved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-24 | jyotikumari042 | 88 | view |
- Online shopping is destroying local businesses.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping with regards to this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experiences or observations. 77
- In urban areas, harmful motor vehicle emissions are responsible for anywhere between 50 and 90 percent of air pollution. Motor vehicles emit a number of pollutants- the most damaging to human health is particulate matter, a combination of organic material 65
- The pen is mightier than the sword Change can be implemented through persuasive argument or through force Which is most effective Support your point of view with details from your own experience observation or reading 66
- Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be able to live for 500 years or more. Would living for 500 ye 72
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...n worldwide. Many environmental factors has contributed to their extinction, howeve...
^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ources before concluding. Our planet comprises of both flora and fauna, which makes our e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ed. Thus, to keep our ecosystem to work in a proper manner, we should always try hard to save such...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90842490842 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71880262644 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7423612805 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203166067946 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773680460479 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820846936442 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144620729249 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103104060206 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.