Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue.
In our society nowadays, population density is becoming an alarming problem in every aspect of life. Recently, it is argued that there are adequate resources to solve the population explosion so it is not a detrimental phenomenon anymore. I totally disagree with that point of view because of many reasons.
Regarding the environment, the more is the world bustling, the more it is extremely contaminated. Looking the former, people are the main reasons causing contamination nowadays. It is identified that the green environment is replaced by the pollution gradually because of the habits of human. Air pollution, for instance, dramatically boosts since CO2 is emitted by industrial development and transportation. To conclude, Should people not have knowledge restriction, the environment will not have deteriorated effects.
As far as government is concerned, they have vast concerns so they cannot just pay attention on population explosion only. With regard to resources, there various kind of issues needing to be subsidized rather than population density. An explanation for this could be that the authority is not affordable to cover all problems happening. It is exemplified that the destitute is waiting for being supportive by financial aid of the government. To sum up, should population explosion be lessened without the authority, the other phenomenon will be tackled meticulously.
In conclusion, although the world has ability to support a crowded population, people is advised to have awareness of this problem to solve themselves. I would argue that the negative effects of population density overshadow the tremendous benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 61 | view |
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- the chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of schools education. 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant. 11
- the bar graph 11
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5753968254 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20887011932 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1880052396 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248327684992 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681252104135 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481089052176 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142557085191 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450724302534 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.