TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec
The reading and listening are both about the pros and cons of cane toad in Australia. The author of the reading believes that presence of cane toads in lands are not beneficial on crops. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article and refutes all the theories presented in the reading passage.
First of all, the author points out that the colony of cane toad can be prevented by spreading by building fences, thus, it can slow they from reaching places they haven't colonize. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that fences is not the solution to the problem in the infestation of cane toad, but, it will only small toads or eggs will be easily escape the net due to their small bodies, hence, they will just floe through the river streams and be spread out to different parts of the river.
Secondly, the author contends that volunteer can capture and destroy them. The article notes that due to their small size they can be easily caught in simple traps and be captured by using bare hands. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that volunteer or untrained individuals will only cause harm to other population of frogs. He elaborates on this by mentioning that toads from the amphibian species looks similar to cane toads, thus, this disparity will lead to endangering other species as well.
Finally, the author states that there are available research that specialize in controlling the population of cane toad, which is causing them to catch virus. The article establishes that the process of the virus is to infect few species of reptiles and amphibian species, thus it specifically will target cane toad. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the virus will affect all the species of amphibian species from central and southern america. Moreover, He puts forth the idea that are easily being transported back from all parts of the world, so the virus being deployed to cane toad will drastically affect the entire ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SereneT110G760 | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | jewel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Ashfaq | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | S M Naimul Mamun | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | S M Naimul Mamun | 80 | view |
- TPO 07- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies th 73
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo 18 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 11 Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...can slow they from reaching places they havent colonize. The point is challenged by th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88563049853 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40684046795 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504398826979 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0125670115 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516137105463 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162054353789 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101541619157 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30705230072 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896618983266 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.