Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chart shows the amount spent on education.
The tabular chart reveals the information about the money spent on four consactive activities by teenagers ; and the second pie chart dipicts the information the money spent on education. The data is calebroted spending on activities is dollar as well as education spending on per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
In the first glance, the tabular chat gives the information of four different habits of teenagers spending money. In 2001, 2002 and 2003 spending by teenagers on cloths had been 100 to 103 dollars. Apart from this, the money spend on cosmetics had been increased 20 dollar in 2001 and 32 dollars in 2003. Furthermore, on food spending by teenagers were 2001, 2002, and 2003 were 150, 160, and again 160 dollars respectively.
In the second glance, that show the spending amount on education for various ways. The 18% spending on projects. Moving forward, the 24% spending on the internet. Moreover, the spending money on membership or books had been 3% , 55% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that in tabular chart the teenagers spend their maximum money on food on the other hand, in pie chart for the educational purpose maximum percentage spending their money on books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-21 | Mani mahendru | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | Mani mahendru | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | Mani mahendru | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | mann ramgharia | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | harniitkaur | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that pressing natural environment is crucial However most make no effort to do so Why do you think this is happening What are some simple actions that could help the environment 56
- Young people in disturbed economies tend to believe violent causing destruction to life and property. What are the causes, impact and ramedies of such problem. 11
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants. 56
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in childhood obesity while others think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...pend on cosmetics had been increased 20 dollar in 2001 and 32 dollars in 2003. Further...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...money on membership or books had been 3% , 55% respectively. Overall, it is evi...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nagers spend their maximum money on food on the other hand, in pie chart for the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, well, apart from, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10552763819 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7903485266 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7321397144 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265413578985 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909227841717 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739327509103 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165519879102 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640596373279 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.