As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree to the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement is true and explain how these considerations shapen your positin
While technological inventions such as computers, calculators, household machines replace humans in doing jobs which require menial skills like handwriting, calculation, washing, cleaning; they aids humans in doing complex tasks such as information gathering, connecting people at different places, tracking vehicles, weather broadcasting, online banking and many other internet services faster and effectively. For a mere menial task which has to be done continuously, machines can replace humans: In doing continuous and mundane calculations computers can replace humans and humans can develop algorithms using which computers do these calculations faster and accurately.
We cannot defy the fact that humans have been increasing their abilities to develop or advance technologies which aid them in doing complex tasks which people decades ago thought impossible, like internet services revolutionised human development ; using google maps we are able find the best route to the new destination (I was surprised by google maps when I used it for the first time), faster modes of transport like airways make people to travel throughout the globe, people are able attend meetings in different countries on same day, in Medical fields through Radioscopy, CT scan, doctors are able to do diagnosis of disorders of patient’s body accurately, using Chemotherapy the most dreadful disease cancer can be cured.
Technological inventions even replace humans in doing jobs which put them at dire, like in many Chemical industries, the reactions and chemicals used are hazardous to humans, using technology these hazardous chemical processes can be completely automated in order to reduce human interactions with huge and dangerous equipment. The highly developed automatic controllers can effectively do human jobs in such unsafe processes.
In fact, in process of technological development humans have been encountering new problems which were not present prior to technological development, like global warming and environmental pollution became imperil only after extensive development of automobiles and industries.
So, it can be concluded like it is absurd to say always that, as people rely more on technology, ability of humans to solve problems for themselves decreases. In order avoid deterioration of some abilities of humans due to technological development, extent of usage of technology by an individual can be limited by himself/herself, for example people can walk instead of using vehicles if they don’t have constraints like limited time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 16
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 3
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 16
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'aid'
Suggestion: aid
...g, calculation, washing, cleaning; they aids humans in doing complex tasks such as i...
^^^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntinuously, machines can replace humans: In doing continuous and mundane calculat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, as to, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7598944591 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18750482048 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583113456464 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 23.0359550562 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 180.385524641 60.3974514979 299% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 272.875 118.986275619 229% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.375 23.4991977007 202% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173010041833 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933933535587 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606087676748 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105872558762 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573443627934 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.4 14.1392134831 208% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 6.85 48.8420337079 14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 12.1743820225 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.02 12.1639044944 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.38706741573 132% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 11.2143820225 185% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.7820224719 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.