The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
A glance at the depicted bar chart illustrates the statistic of 10 leading countries for supply and demand of electricity in 2014. First and foremost, China and United States had considerably high consumption of electricity comparing with other countries and all of these TOP 10 nations' energy production was more than its usage except the Germany.
One noteworthy feature is that, China and US which are the main exporter of electricity are 5 to 10 times greater usage and supply than other 8 countries. For these 2 dominants, the China produced 5398 billion KWh and the US production of energy was 4099 billion KWh in 2014 even though their charges was slightly lower than providing.
Also noteworthy is the fact that, the difference between production and consumption of electricity was considerable with 120 billion KWh in Canada while there was almost equal supply and demand among Russian.
Regarding to other countries particularly Japan, India, France, Brazil and Korea, the both figure of data was under 1000 billion KWh and their margins were gentle for each country.
Briefly we can see from that most of the country's consumption of electricity was slightly lower than its production in 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-31 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... was slightly lower than providing. Also noteworthy is the fact that, the differ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16243654822 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74495876639 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.4316237923 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.285714286 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267139707725 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136628507911 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860523771474 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156600372596 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963647631412 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.