The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
A glance at the depicted bar charts illustrates how Japanese and Malaysians share their income in the year 2010. First and foremost, here is considered for average household expenditures to following sectors particularly housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services.
In term of Japanese, they spent almost a fifth of the earnings for housing when Malaysians paid noticeable higher payment that occupies 34% of their total. Moreover, they expended 20% of the income for transport and 6% for health care even though these services are provided in Malaysia twice lower.
Regarding to Malaysians, they shared the amount which is equal to 26% of their household expenditures to other goods and services and that was slightly lower comparing with Japanese do. However, 27% of the budget was paid to food was a little higher than Japanese paid.
Briefly we can see from the graph that living expense in both Japan and Malaysia is almost similar exclude the transport, health care and housing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Diksha Bharti | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | dohong0812 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | vongocson | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Tee Dos | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | My | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 79
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the budget was paid to food was a little higher than Japanese paid. Briefly w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, however, if, moreover, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20731707317 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6075041572 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4760508306 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148076914705 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630289991018 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503763743973 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864606976688 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657971903925 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.