Wealthy should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster. Do you agree or disagree.
It has been argued that during natural disaster rich countries must help developing nations by showing their helping hand through humanitarian grants. This essay agrees with the statement because monitory grants would certainly help the suffering countries to restore the infrastructural facilities and this would build up good relationship.
During the natural disaster supporting a suffering countries would surely help to improve the relationships between the nations. It is very important that to maintain healthy relationships between countries and it is obvious that the helps during the bad time will always be remembered. This will open up the new opportunity for both the nations to take the countries in to a great position. For instance, India had helped Afghanistan during the recent earthquake and provided plenty of relief which would help both the nations to sign useful agreement.
The help provided during the natural calamities would help the poorer countries to rebuilt the infrastructure facilities. The basic need like shelter, electricity, water etc are important facilities which would lack in the bad time. It is very important to restore the infrastructure at the earliest which would certainly help the people who are suffering. A recent study found that humanitarian relief contributes 40% to restore the infrastructure for the developing nation who suffers with natural disaster.
To conclude, richer countries must help poorer countries at the time of natural disaster and provide humanitarian relief which would certainly strengthen the relationship among the nations and this would help the suffering country a quick relief.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-18 | tranminh14032003 | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-16 | Jitenramen | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | Ragesh R | 63 | view |
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 11
- Some people believe that range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect.Discuss these points of views. What is your opinion? 73
- Some people think that when young people use more computers andmobile phones, their reading and writing skills are affected. To whatextent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Computers are being used more and more in education Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 81
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local la 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...tural disaster rich countries must help developing nations by showing their helping hand t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...natural disaster supporting a suffering countries would surely help to improve the relati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61507936508 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98016401411 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0270090837 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.636363636 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205614615949 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09590855914 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673951602764 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155719560273 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030007410486 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.