Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people to visit a country’s cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words
It is generally observed that the visiting prices for historical and heritage sites have a vast difference for locals and foreigners. In my opinion, charging outsiders more compared to locals is acceptable to certain extent to generate revenue but only if they are awarded some extra advantages to make them feel special since they have paid more.
To Begin with, it is a huge misconception that all the visitors are from rich background so they can easily afford costly entry fees. Some of them are investing their life saving, which they may have earned by sweating their blood, to travel and explore various cultural sites throughout the world. Charging them heavily just based on their country of origin when locals are paying minimal fee, is an open discrimination towards them. For Instance, Taj Mahal, which is the central attraction for foreigners, charges 1000INR more compared to Non-Indian citizens. In short, every visitor should be treated equally and charged equally.
However, these old historical places, which literally have stood against the test of time, require enormous fund for its maintenance. Since authorities are always struggling with scarcity of money to manage such places, this extra money levied from foreigners come handy. Moreover, people, who have traveled from various nations, are more excited about the beautiful architecture and diversified culture so they do not mind paying a few extra bucks. So, charging them little more is acceptable as long as the difference minimal.
The most effective solution would be to award some extra privileges, such as allowing them to carry cameras to few places, as a way of compensation for the extra cash. In this way, not only they would feel special but also encourage them to pay even more without having any hard feelings.
In Conclusion, little imbalance in prices is acceptable for financial support if the same is awarded with some special services. So that tourism industry can prosper without having any deteriorating impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | Manpreet1809 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | aakash chokshi | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | sandip24 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | ShahnumZ | 78 | view |
- You have a pen-friend living in another country and he/she is curious to learn about the major news items in your country.Write a letter to your pen-friend. In your letter:•Greet your friend and say why you are writing.•Briefly describe a news story. 78
- Caring for our children is very important part of our society. Therefore all mothers and fathers should take a childcare training course. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 95
- Some people think that people who are over 60 years old should not work and retire earlier To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street Why it is effect and problem What is the main causes Your suggestions 82
- You are planning to go on a holiday in another country. Write a letter to your friend asking him/her to join. Include following in your letter.•Why you need a holiday.•Your holiday plans.•Why you need your friend to join with you. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... such as allowing them to carry cameras to few places, as a way of compensation fo...
^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is awarded with some special services. So that tourism industry can prosper without ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64349644683 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2781735366 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120350612319 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432407478221 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349012861867 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656937316072 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447341270391 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.