The graph below compare figures for production and consumption of energy in the us from 1950 to 2000.it also predict the figures of 2025.
The line chart depict the information about the production and consumption of energy by us during the year 1950 to 2000 as well as predicting of the figure for 2025.
Overall, it is evident that production and consumption of energy in the US start form same unit , then it will be increased in the future.
Having a quick glance upon the linear chart. In 1959, consumption and production of US 30 unit of energy, then approximately year 1956 to 1971 was 30 unit of energy ,then grow slowly at 1971. Moreover, in 1972 , the energy level of both categories was just 60 unit ,and 90 unit or 60 unit of energy in 2002. Noticeably projection of US consumption or production , it will be 80 unit or 130 unit in 2025.
It is crystal clear , the consumption and production of energy in US energy import was start from 1975 then imports was flustrate throughout the period . It was just around the 55 to 85 unit of energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Jhand raman | 73 | view |
- The following graph and pie chart show the sales of a company in the first and the second quart of the year. in percentage 61
- The three pie. Charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981,1991 and 2001 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle and stages in th production of the silk cloth 56
- Essay topics: In many countries women no longer feel the need to get married,some people believe that this because women are able to earn own income and therefore do not require financial security that marriage can bring to. What do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that servers short holiday from school are better, while other think one long summer holiday for the year is better for children . Discuss and include your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of energy in the US start form same unit , then it will be increased in the future...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... year 1956 to 1971 was 30 unit of energy ,then grow slowly at 1971. Moreover, in 1...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n grow slowly at 1971. Moreover, in 1972 , the energy level of both categories was...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evel of both categories was just 60 unit ,and 90 unit or 60 unit of energy in 2002...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ojection of US consumption or production , it will be 80 unit or 130 unit in 2025....
^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r 130 unit in 2025. It is crystal clear , the consumption and production of energ...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumption and production of energy in US energy import was start from 1975 then i...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...orts was flustrate throughout the period . It was just around the 55 to 85 unit of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49397590361 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67505349863 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0794736811 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270807090001 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127524167042 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130421501572 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205906958074 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132074945659 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.