The graphs below compare the number ò cosmetic procedures performed on males and females in Korea in 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts given demonstrate the number of cosmetic procedures conducted on males and females in Korea in 2004. The differences in the types of surgeries and the amount of operations between the two genders can be clearly seen.
There is no surprise that plastic procedures are preferred by women. The most popular type of surgery they chose was eyelid, with a number of 320000, approximately. Rhinoplasty came second. The times this was done was about 280000. Breast enlargement and surgery type liposuction were least taken. Respectively, there were 150000 and 120000 times these procedures were selected.
In comparison to women, the quantity of cosmetic surgery taken by the counterpart was by far less. The records shown there were 50000 hair transplantation operations taken by men, which make it the most favorite among them. This was more than six times less than the most picked by women. Abdominoplasty and surgery type were not as popular as the rest. The former was carried out about 20000 times and the latter had a number of 18000.
It is obvious that both gender preferred laser skin resurfacing and rhinoplasty. On the contrary, liposuction, breast enlargement and eyelid surgery were taken by women only; while men chose hair transplantation executively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-12 | Drake004 | 65 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | saklovesyao | 81 | view |
- Forest produces fresh oxygen and participates in regulating climate But every year trees cover of our planet is lessening due to deforestation What are the primary causes of deforestation What result may it lead to 78
- Some people point out that there will be less international travel in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative trend? 73
- The graphs below compare the number cosmetic procedures performed on males and females in Korea in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Some people think museums should be enjoyable places to attract and entertain young people. Others think the purpose of museums is to educate, not to entertain. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24757281553 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88817001971 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7914851145 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7333333333 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0970424646743 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362514690405 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713438968017 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688625979111 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662915869257 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.