Nowadays culture is much the same all around the world when compared to previous times. Do you think this a positive or negative development?
These days, people’s way of life is becoming similar all over the world as opposed to the past. In my opinion, the similarity of culture all around the world is a negative development.
First of all, one of the main drawbacks of this development is that people no longer care about their Heritage. In the past, our heritage defined us and gave us our rich culture. This has lead to people respecting each other’s views and custom. But now, even with the level of globalization, we are still more divided than the olden days. When people lose their culture, then they have lost the values that unify them and as a result, are likely going to be conflicted and divide. Also, people become less tolerant towards others and lack respect for other people’s culture. To exemplify this, two major tribes of the Yoruba land, Modakeke, and Ife tribe fought for years because of the lack of respect for each others culture, one believed she was superior to the other and likewise the other. Rather than accepting their differences, they fought for 10 years before they realized the importance of this. So, contrary to popular opinion that similarity in culture brings people together, it actually tears them apart.
Secondly, tourism has been on the low recently because of the lack of interest in other peoples custom. In the past, tourism has generated a lot of income in several countries. By having a large number of people coming to experience these cultures has resulted in the creation of more job opportunities in restaurants, hotels, museums, art galleries and historical places and consequently, boosting the economic growth of a country. Nowadays, people hardly care about learning new cultures since there is nothing more to be learned. Another added advantage of tourism is that it allows people to be tolerant towards one another, it removes bias and skepticism. When people come to new places and get accustomed to new ways of life, it creates a more friendly environment and erases pre-formed thought people have about others. To exemplify this, the Japanese have managed to preserve their unique culture, which generates a large amount of revenue through tourism yearly.
To sum up. I would like to reiterate that having similar custom all around the world is not a good development because it has resulted in more conflict, divide and poor tourism culture amongst people as well as a loss of a sense of belonging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-12 | Humoyun Rahimov | 92 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | Shahzoob | 73 | view |
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this.What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to 61
- Wealthy nations should assist poor countries with humanitarian relief during naional disaster. do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people feel that entertainers such as filmt stars, pop music and or sport stars are paid too much moneyDo you agree or disagree 11
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concer 56
- Some people feel that entertainers such as filmt stars, pop music and or sport stars are paid too much moneyDo you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 188, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... income in several countries. By having a large number of people coming to experience these cultu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98533007335 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64113686202 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550122249389 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8187685791 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.95 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11654392551 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414809211784 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597756057699 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104982316718 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591864304411 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.