The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some may say that the effectiveness of a country's leader could be best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens, but such approach is one-dimential, failing to understand what leadership is about, and is based on the false assumption that a single leader alone could dramatically improve the lot of people.
First, measuring the effectiveness of a leader by looking into how well of the citizens of his or her country are is too subjectve. How do we measure the well-being of people? Some may argue that the well-being of a country' citizens could be objectively measured by how much income they earn or by looking at the GDP of the nation. However, we must remember that studies have found that there is not a clear correlation between the income level of people and happiness. Often, studies report that People in Nepal, a small and economically underdeveloped country in Asia, ranks the top in regard to their satisfaction about life in general. Also, the economically developed countries suffer from high suicidal rates. Thus, measuring the well-being of people could be an evasive task.
This leads us to the next question. Then why does people in Nepal find more satisfaction in their life compared to citizens of other countries? Is it because of the effectiveness of their leadership? Although nothing can be said conclusively about what attributes their positive outlook on their life, it may has to do with their history, culture and religion in general. A people group may have a distinctive approach to life shaped by its history, culture and religion. It can be hardly imagined that a single leader could exhort his influence over people in a such radical way as to change in a very short period of time people's worldview. It takes the whole society, from its leaders and the average citizens, for a society to experience transformation in its understanding of what constitute good life. Thus, measuring the effectiveness of a country's leader fails to account for the fact that the definition of good life is formed through discourse among members of a society.
Lastly, measuring the effectiveness of a country's leader by measuring the well-being of that country's citizens does not consider the fact that a leader of a nation may influence the well-being of the citizens of other nations. For example, a country may remember a certain leader cherishably because under his leadership, the country experienced an ecomic boom. What is that economic boom was built upon the sarcrifice of other nations? Thus, in evaluating a country's leader, we must be careful not to limit the scope of evaluation to the effect he or she had on a single nation, but we must take note how that leader countributed to humanity in general.
Because measuring a leaders' effectiveness based on the well-being of that country's citizens is a subjective task and one-dimentional, we must take more holistic and multi-dimentional approach in evaluating the effectiveness of a reader.
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'saith', 'says'.
Suggestion: saith; says
Some may say that the effectiveness of a countrys le...
^^^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...sure the well-being of people? Some may argue that the well-being of a country citize...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
... argue that the well-being of a country citizens could be objectively measured by how mu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...adical way as to change in a very short period of time peoples worldview. It takes the whole s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...o change in a very short period of time peoples worldview. It takes the whole society, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...anity in general. Because measuring a leaders effectiveness based on the well-being o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, look, may, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in general, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2498.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03629032258 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06311247565 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449596774194 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4006929722 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.952380952 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.619047619 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251403719497 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857333711169 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678370645423 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173259999494 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391256106981 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.