The maps below show an island, before and after construction of some tourist facilities.
The provided pictorial diagrams compares the development of an island before and after the construction of several tourist alluring facilities.
Overall, it is crystal clear that, there are numerous changes have been done with the appropriate planning without harming any natural resources.
According to the diagram, before the construction the whole island is empty. There are only few trees and beach is available there, within the area of 100 metres. Additionally, after the construction number of changes have been made like, houses are constructed for the tourist facilities. More impressively, footpaths and vehicle tracks are made to cover short and long distances, mainly at north and West side of island.
Moreover, along with the beach, swimming facility is provided according to new plan. Apart from it, reception area is in the centre ans and restaurant is built at north side of island. Noticeably, piers have been made to easy reach to go on island and yards are also there for other facilities. Specifically, all the construction is made without cut down the trees.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-18 | hunanmail | 78 | view |
2019-08-05 | Chula | 56 | view |
2019-07-19 | BaoChau18 | 78 | view |
2019-05-20 | Jasmineeee | 78 | view |
2019-05-11 | Adewumi Akinwale | 78 | view |
- Young people in distributed economies tend to become violent causing distraction to life and property. Wha are the causes, impacts and remedies of such problem. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK schools in 1981,1991and 2001 22
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam". Do you think that this statement is true? What measure can government take to address this problem? 35
- The maps below show an island, before and after construction of some tourist facilities. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and ma 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, apart from, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32947976879 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82564968947 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7149770728 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280831722507 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11224818263 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123937847599 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188177776556 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145743621667 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.