The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the prevalence of various means that were adopted by schoolers aged 5-12 in a country in the year of 1990 and 2010. All in all, the data differ significantly.
As shown in the information of 1990, the majority of junior learners in this country chose to walk to school in this period, reaching over a staggering 12 million trips per year. By contrast, transportation entailing bus and cycling, as well as a blended utilisation of bus and walking accounted for a practically identical number of 6 million trips, which was approximately half of that of pure walking. Likewise, the number of commute between home and school conducted by car passenger was also rather modest, registering a merely 4 million in 1990.
In stark contrast, this country, however, saw a dominant prevalence in the use of car in 2010. With a doubled climb, approximately 11 million trips were performed on car, while other means for travelling from and to school saw a significant drop in their compositions. In fact, having undergone a dramatic decline in two decades, bikes were used in 2 million trips only in 2010
Overall, at the time of 2010, car was surpassing other means of commute among students of play age.
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 84
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 84
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89371980676 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90128695327 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6038647343 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7118539196 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174749266161 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729281410443 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234694314477 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921327133028 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399374447904 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.