Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons or examples.
Over the last few decades, there have been a drive to encourage students to pursue higher education in university. There is a conflicting opinion revolving around whether schools should equip students for university or for work. From my own perspective I believe that schools should prepare the students for university education rather than for employment. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument by providing appropriate examples.
Schools should make the students ready for the higher studies because of several reasons. To be precise, schools make the basic foundation of education in student's life, which helps them to study more higher degrees. For example, on the basis of the high school subjects selection, pupils make their choices for university education and this helps them to get establish in more profound jobs later on in their lives. Thus, it is explicit to say that if schools will prepare the students for university rather than work than it is going to be helpful for them in their employment.
Having said that, the ultimate goal of education is to get establish into a good job, so that the schools should be preparing the students for employment rather than work. More specifically, every individuals get education to earn money by getting a job. If schools will only emphasis on learning part, for instance, then pupils will not get trained in any skill set which is quite indispensable in today's competitive job market. Briefly, it is indeed a requisite for the schools to train students for work.
This essay discussed how schools should be focusing on making foundation for higher studies for students and should also trained them for employment. In my opinion, I believe that schools should pay more attention on making strong foundation in students for university education which will help them in getting better job in their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | jyotikumari042 | 80 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 75
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 72
- Currently there is a glut of ill-trained university graduates flooding into economies that have no use for them. Up to thirty percent of applicants should be directed to vocational colleges.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this state 80
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement with some examples. 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...tudents life, which helps them to study more higher degrees. For example, on the basis of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'train'
Suggestion: train
...er studies for students and should also trained them for employment. In my opinion, I b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10423452769 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65484502428 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478827361564 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8258966103 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323538191779 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154607685004 0.0925447433944 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972115000395 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245504769448 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389393357229 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.