Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whilst some members of the society underscore the importance of the technological advancement for increasing working standard of employees on their work place, however others advocates that introducing these technologies have no convenience to workers. There are rational arguments on both views of this contentious top which will be discussed in details followed by my opinion.
In old days everything was manuel and workers had to struggle a lot to complete their office tasks, but it is evident that modern technology has made employee's life easier by providing advance computers, smartphones and many other new technological gadgets. In this modern era everything is digitalised and nobody nolonger required to spend hours and hours to complete their jobs. As an example, accountants have Microsoft Excel which help them to perform advance calculations in split of a second. Therefore, with the help of technology employees have been able to perfom work wiht a higer accuracy and efficiency.
However, on the flipside of this, technology has made user more monotonus and less creative. It has taken out the thinking capability of the employee who obsessed with technology and will not work thier own initiative and their skills will buried under the skin. For an instant, the very moment employees stranded without computers and softwares they are in a deep trouble and find no-way out due their higher dependancy on machines.
In, my opinion, morden techonology has invade people's lives too much. As result, workers are unable to keep their work and familiy life in balance which has caused lot familiy issues. Work from home concept which enable employee to perfom job function from home, instead of providing benefits it has caused inefficiencies such as a distractions to work and low quality work output.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, it is my firm conviction that undoubtedly, improved technology has provided immense benefits to the working society and It is just the matter of the way how someone utilize it for the betterment of their working lives.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-28 | Sasuke0789 | 78 | view |
2018-09-17 | nazirsumara | 78 | view |
2018-09-06 | yaarnick | 84 | view |
2018-09-05 | yaarnick | 84 | view |
2018-09-04 | sahilverma16 | 78 | view |
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historic buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it As a citizen you don t want it to happen Write a letter to the city council and say What is the importance of the building Why s 93
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people argue that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures Others argue that these sports can cause problems and increase conflict between nations Discuss both pints and give your opinion 92
- Some people argue that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and increase conflict between nations. Discuss both pints and give your opinion. 84
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees Others think it is a disadvantage for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bury'
Suggestion: bury
...er own initiative and their skills will buried under the skin. For an instant, the ver...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'invaded'.
Suggestion: invaded
... In, my opinion, morden techonology has invade peoples lives too much. As result, work...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a distraction' or simply 'distractions'?
Suggestion: a distraction; distractions
...ts it has caused inefficiencies such as a distractions to work and low quality work output. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25513196481 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85331366183 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58651026393 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.043850229 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163189185264 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560312197331 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451786739522 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887552325708 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360622343204 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.