should Parents be legally held responsible for their children’s acts? support your reasoning with example
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in parents being held responsible for their children’s behaviour. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and should be rejected.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that parents’ intervention can heavily influence a child’s personality and behaviour development. Not only does parents’ responsibility to shape their children’s attitude and instill good values into them, but they also play an important role in children’s upbringing as they spend most of time with them. Needless to say, parents should act as gatekeepers to prevent their children from observing wrong examples.
Another pivotal aspect is that parents should be aware of their children’s acts or actions. Besides, we cannot expect parents to protect their children all day, but parents can raise their children with good or bad moral ethics. Moreover, a child learns languages, culture and manners by observing their parents. So I think parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the role of parents in shaping children’s behaviour is instrumental indeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-11 | waqasaslam294@mail.com | 77 | view |
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and 72
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, moreover, so, still, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54502369668 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37171067477 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597156398104 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2482736638 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477822846567 0.242375264174 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185291935464 0.0925447433944 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153739343482 0.071462118173 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291361448868 0.151781067708 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134102452542 0.0609392437508 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.