Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
The idea of medical technology increasing average life expectancy of people all over the world is widely debated with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for it’s drawbacks. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
One of the most conspicuous aspects of using medical equipment is that people will have better medical facilities than ever before. Not only can medical instruments help to diagnose diseases effectively, thanks to state-of-the-art medical equipment, but it can also contribute to increase the average life expectancy of people. Needless to say, all these benefits stand people in good stead when it comes to cure fatal diseases with much ease and convenience.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that greater life expectancy is beneficial for a family as well as the society. Furthermore, the average life expectancy for both genders has increased tremendously during the last five decades in almost all countries. Increased life expectancy has immensely benefited us both economically and socially. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of advanced medical technologies.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of technological instrument for mankind are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | saeidazizi | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Hemavathi | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | Navneet dhillon | 72 | view |
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Whether design of the building has a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 55
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 72
- Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and 72
- Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33492822967 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94901463999 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2521005395 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204957684 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770016271692 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483802898116 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123687942164 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00714396707389 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.