The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue of whether the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones is a contentious one. While some people object to this claim, I strongly believe that the statement is true, because awarding always contributes person’s motivation to learn. Furthermore, neglecting negative actions compounds the relationship between teacher and learner, and increases effectiveness of the lesson.
First of all, the best way to teach should build a robust relationship between teacher and learner. Although there are some techniques to achieve this goal, praising positive and ignoring negative actions is the best one, because, in this way, teacher would be encouraging learner to motivate himself. A math student, for example, is taking private lesson from a teacher. When student makes calculation mistakes, if teacher says it is not a problem rather than rebuke him, student will not be frustrated, and he will try to correct his errors. Additionally, his learning process will be much faster as he starts to find the topics which he is weak at, and focus on them.
Admittedly, some may argue that punishing the negative actions would be more instructive. This claim is true especially when it comes to shy students. However, this method is too risky for aggressive students, because they can immediately resist to the teacher and start to hate the topic. Since this statement is not valid for all kinds of learners, it cannot be considered as the best way to teach.
In conclusion, we need to find the best way to build healthy relationships between teacher and learner to find the best way to teach. As we discussed above, praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones is an appropriate method to build such strong relationships. Hence, I agree with the recommendation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | Faisal Injamam | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | rkalita8 | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | swathi3pet | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sunandaroy | 50 | view |
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 34
- This argument states that the Excelsior Company should conduct similar promotions that were done by Superior in introducing its own brand of coffee. While the author presents a merit in the claim, there are several questionable assumptions and evidence in 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 58
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17346938776 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89283864628 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5763821845 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205873411539 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757227697736 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654445456331 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138615586456 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454621178801 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.