Which one do you prefer? Why?
A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days.
Nowadays, human being’s jobs are very crucial. Genuinely, they determine that how much our nation is successful. Although a plethora of people believe that it is more profitable for a person to have a challenging job with a few vacation days, others disagree with this point of view and hold the opinion that a perfect career should have more vacation and less challenges. I, to a considerable extent, hold the latter viewpoint. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that sundry interesting projects have some benefits for employees who work on them. These people have a lot of impetus to implement their duties with the best quality. Furthermore, in order to accomplish this kind of projects, people have to learn a great deal of information in different fields of science. This means that they would become more knowledgeable than someone who do an unchallenging job, which means that they are more prosperous in their tasks. To shed more light on this matter, the noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research shown that human beings who encounter with challenges at their work, have powerful brains, and are able to cope with different problems easier. As it is clear, the more challenging career someone has, the more benefits he would gain.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that having an exciting job is a kind of entertainment. As a matter of fact, individuals spent most of their time at work; therefore, if they enjoy their jobs, they would not need a great hosts of vacation days. In such cases, their jobs are their amusement, and thanks to their interests in their duties they have better performances. To give a tangible example, consider a man who does not like his career; hence it is very tedious for him to continue his job for a long time with no or a few vacation days. In other words, after a few weeks he would feel that he is bored and his tasks are very repetitive. Consequently, in order to reinforce his spirit and become eager to accomplish his tasks again, he should go to vacation. Therefore, people with interesting tasks are more energetic.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it can be more advantageous for human beings if they chose exciting jobs with a few vacation days. This contention id due to the fact that not only are these careers more beneficial but also they are more enjoyable. Consequently, it is highly recommended that people accomplish such work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-18 | Hamedready | 70 | view |
- TPO39Do you agree or disagree?In the past it was easier identify what kind of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 40
- TPO40Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think it is a good idea? 70
- Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions, radio and internet sources are less concerned about the accuracy of news. They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect.Do you agree or disagree? 76
- Do you agree or disagree?It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. 70
- tpo 53Integrated task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun challenges is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ct career should have more vacation and less challenges. I, to a considerable extent...
^^^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun impetus seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of impetuses'.
Suggestion: a lot of impetuses
...ees who work on them. These people have a lot of impetus to implement their duties with the best...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...o continue his job for a long time with no or a few vacation days. In other words,...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to excite'.
Suggestion: to excite
...ntageous for human beings if they chose exciting jobs with a few vacation days. This con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, kind of, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87420042644 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76647172838 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513859275053 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2806175798 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184113179269 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546522122605 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519451647775 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125081280216 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028424657502 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.