The United States should dispense with regulated speed limits on interstate highways, since drivers rarely abide by them.
The statement claims that the UnitedStates should dispense with regulated speed limits on interstate highways because it seems that drivers do not usually obey them. Although it might seem plausible to disregard laws which are not effective, we can't just dispense with regulated speed limits on interstate highways, since the laws regarding this issue are made to make sure that the possibility of incidents and accidents that could be fatal are minimized. Moreover, simply dismissing laws because citizens do not follow them could lead to many damages and a state of anarchy. Therefore, I can not entirely agree with the statement.
laws regarding regulating speed on interstate highways are particularly enforced to prevent accidents from happening. Since interstate highways are very long and wide and it takes a long time to pass through them, drivers become restless and bored and tend to drive with extremely high speeds while driving through them to get to their destination faster. A tired driver might not think meticulously at the time about the consequences of driving with high speed, but it does not mean that steering exceedingly fast is not dangerous. Law-makers have rightfully realized that there needs to be a limit to the speed of driving on interstate highways. it is cogent to deduce that if two vehicles both drive extremely fast when they crash, the blow would be very strong and could easily lead to loss of life on both parts. As a matter of fact, statistics show that people who disregard speed regulations are responsible for the majority of the accidents in interstate highways. Therefore the law is justly addressing a pressing issue germane to driving in interstate highways. However, if people tend to disobey speeding laws, research should take place to understand what cause this kind of disregard for the law, so that the law can be revised in a way that is more realistic and applicable.
Another Assumption that the statement makes is that if the law is not followed by drivers, it should result in the dismantlement of that law. However, it is not plausible to conclude that laws should only be enforced if they are being followed. There are many proper laws that a portion of the population might not follow them, that benefit society's well-being and safety. Moreover, if there are no laws in place, society could end up in a state of anarchy and disharmony. it is not possible to function properly without certain regulations which structure how we live our lives in society as a whole. The dismantlement of the regulated speed limits could lead to many drivers getting used to reckless driving and disregarding their own and other people's safety. This type of irresponsible behavior than easily lead to havoc in society and have further negative repercussion that can go beyond reckless driving in interstate highways.
As mentioned earlier, when are instances where laws are not being obeyed, there needs to be a thorough examination of the reasons behind such a phenomenon. Proper action must be taken to adjust the laws in ways that are in congruency with people's needs and expectations, but simply disregarding and remitting a law would only cause further complications and hurdles.Therefore based on the reasons stated above, the validity of the statement is limited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...regard laws which are not effective, we cant just dispense with regulated speed limi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Laws
...not entirely agree with the statement. laws regarding regulating speed on interstat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...peed of driving on interstate highways. it is cogent to deduce that if two vehicle...
^^
Line 2, column 973, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...f the accidents in interstate highways. Therefore the law is justly addressing a pressing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...p in a state of anarchy and disharmony. it is not possible to function properly wi...
^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...cause further complications and hurdles.Therefore based on the reasons stated above, the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...cause further complications and hurdles.Therefore based on the reasons stated above, the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, kind of, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2770.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 546.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07326007326 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82450124739 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468864468864 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 864.9 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6972330782 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.904761905 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294944591577 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971973467207 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870210335565 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195700944979 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121713269778 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.