The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree
Some people argue that providing parents with necessary parenting techniques is the most effective way to cope with increasing rates of juvenile delinquency. From my perspective, joint efforts from families and schools are needed to curb those heightened concerns.
To start with, children tend to unconsciously imitate words and actions of adults. Therefore, it is of paramount importance that parents should serve as powerful role models not only through direct interactions with their children, but through the examples they set with their attitude and behavior within the family and in the outside world. There is mounting evidence that bad upbringing can exert bad implications on a child’s livelihood, increasing the chance of their involvement in juvenile offences. Therefore, parental training such as developing and practicing positive discipline technique could prevent and reduce youth crimes.
On the other hand, schools and other educational institutions also play a major part in the prevention and control of juvenile crime. While parents can act as the first defense in decreasing young offenders, it is noteworthy that children may commit a crime or other wrongdoings under negative peer pressure at school. In other words, schools second only to families in their potential to affect children’s mental health. They can contribute to young people’s success development by providing nurturance and the opportunity to develop social and psychological skills. Eventually, school-based programs are crucial in keeping children from embarking on a life of crime.
In conclusion, in order to address the problem of youth crime, parental training along with positive school guidance for youngsters would help shape young minds into law-abiding citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | drsnn | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | dkklinkkk | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people. Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped. Discuss both views. 56
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75471698113 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02533270062 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652830188679 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7528965235 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246840506932 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807961164537 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637826668015 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146687770499 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298502357073 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.