Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations.
Throughout history the human life and the wild life has been entwined firmly. The primitive human depended strongly on the wild life for satisfying its needs. With the growth and development of the civilizations, humans -requiring a vast amount of natural resources and struggling for survival- turned to their old company, the wildlife, harvesting and destructing it. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is that whether it is important for governments to protect the wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations or not. I personally contend that the wild life is essential for the next generations. In what follows, I will elaborate on my view point.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the wild life is the heritage of the earth, thus it is our duty to preserve it with all the effort. It is essential for the next generations to observe the wild life and inherit this formidable treasure. Take for example the outstanding virginal jungles of amazon and its reach and vibe wild life, the next generations would miss one of the world’s most beautiful jungles if their harvesting and destruction continues.
Second, the wild life has a lot to learn from. By studying wild animals and plants, one can reveal the secrets of the nature, the source of life and even the possibility of life on the other planets. What may come as a surprise is the accumulation of the evidence suggesting that there are still a vast number of uncovered, unsolved and confined mysteries throughout the world which their answers can be find within the wilderness areas.
Finally, in addition to what was mentioned above, the wild life was there to help us in the times of challenge, now it is our turn to return the favor. Throughout decades the wilderness areas have provided the humans what they need for survival, it is against the conscience if one abuses them for his or her selfish desires.
All the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the wild life and wilderness areas play a crucial rule in the next generations’ heritage. It is their undisputable right and its preservation is our definite duty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | ehsanghoflsaz | 76 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | hesam_75 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | javadsafari | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | javadsafari | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Mehran-mech.90 | 81 | view |
- TPO 36 3
- Both the reading passage and the lecture argues the idea of sending humans to Mars. With this in mind, the author states that there are several problems which could be solved in this project. On the othe hand, the lecturer claims that although this projec 76
- tpo 24 76
- Both the reading and the lecture are talk about the possible reasons of a behavior in birts, rubbing the ants on their feathers. With this in mind, the author states that there are several possibility benefits for birds can get frome thid behavior. On the 70
- tpo 53Integrated task 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, thus, as for, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95355191257 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90233004036 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516393442623 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7957325291 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260467601169 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918696743552 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935406924347 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141541739819 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915448430411 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.