The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree?
People have different views as to how public money should be spent on health care systems. In my opinion, I totally agree with the idea that the government should spend a larger proportion of health care budget on preventing diseases and ailments than curing them.
To begin with, one advantage of precautions over treatments is that some health problems are incurable and thus it is crucial that methods should be taken to prevent these illnesses rather than deal with them. Despite the strongly development of science and technology today, people have not yet find a feasible way to completely treat a number of fatal diseases such as cancer or HIV/AIDS. However, these illnesses would be easily kept under control by a high public awareness about lifestyles and eating habits, which could be promoted by a proper investment on health education programs. For that reason, government spending on health care should be divert from medicine and treatment to health promotion campaigns.
Beside the aforementioned upside, I would argue that government funding for preventive measures brings about greater economic benefits for society as a whole than investing on hospitals. As for some certain diseases, the expenses of cure for people are by far greater than preventing. For example, 20 years ago, widespread plagues of malaria drove many Vietnamese families to impoverishment because of the expensive cost of treatment compared to their meager incomes. But the problem later was successfully remedied by well-funded government plans to improve the living environment in rural areas and sponsored inoculations for the underprivileged, which was reported to be less than the total money the Vietnamese had spent on curing the disease before.
In conclusion, due to the arguments presented above, I firmly hold the opinion that it is a priority for the government to direct total health care spending towards the preventive measures against health problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-21 | Adam maddd | 78 | view |
- Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment. 84
- the performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. what can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. Why do you think that is?What could be done to encourage more peo 96
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why they do so and what the outcome of this situation is Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 87
- nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the the reasons? Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of health care budget on preventing diseases and ailments than curing them. ...
^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'diverted'?
Suggestion: diverted
...nment spending on health care should be divert from medicine and treatment to health p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36569579288 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85761434062 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3228123231 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230112785094 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916854950785 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618857101935 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142791970455 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033867259233 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.