Some people think that government funding should be focused on taking precaution when it comes to preventing health issues, rather than dealing with treatment and medicine later. I completely agree with that, due to the fact that there are problems that can be prevented by monitoring and taking precautions before doing certain activities.
To begin with, sexual transmitted diseases are a major health issue with no actual cure until this day, however, there are several safety measures to be applied that could help restrain such problems. Spending more funding on spreading sexual awareness will help reduce the proportion of STD’s patients; for instance, including it in the educational system such as in schools, colleges and universities; also using media to promote awareness on how to use protection. As a consequence of that, taking precautions will definitely decrease health related problems. Furthermore, applying it on a global scope shall change the perspective on how to enhance health complications, and how it should be dealt with.
Moreover, food nowadays is the reason for many health problems, while it can be controlled if precautions are made. First of all, food is the main reason for many health problems such as obese, diabetics and blood pressure; yet by monitoring the criteria of what’s been listed as healthy food, also by maintaining the healthiest amount of sugar that is used in products. In fact, by controlling and monitoring all the ingredients that are being used in products based on a specialist scale will prevent a plenty of health issues. Finally, if government funding is directed to prevention instead of dealing with the issue, a huge progress will be witnessed in the health sector.
In conclusion, it’s important to prevent health related problems instead of treatment and medicine. Hence, government funding should reflect that.
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 78
- In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example
- Some people think that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 73
- In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 10
- In many parts of the world families were larger in the past because people had more children Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36912751678 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84946557773 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8241233033 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275265531551 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111337606746 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826513683594 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206982633968 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112274063906 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.