In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not to build homes there. What is your opinion?
For centuries, many countries around the globe have profoundly suffered from overpopulation especially in capital cities. Consequently, there is an ascending global trend to expand new houses to the countryside . While some people believe that countryside should be firmly protected from building new houses, my firm conviction is that countryside should be wisely exploited to off-load the overpopulation dilemma for certain reasons that will be tackled in this essay.
On one hand, some people argue that the countryside should be saved from the housing expansion for some reasons. Firstly, they believe that housing expansion is literally a major destruction to both the nature and the environment. Moreover, they say that nature had enough from the adverse human interventions. For instance, when people will build in the countryside, they will certainly cut down some trees or vanish some green areas. Secondly, they think that it is irrational to pose harms to the nature while people can expand vertically as been done in some cities.
Conversely, others including myself emphasize on the importance of exploiting the countryside to provide room for people to live. Our hypothesis is built on some reasons. First and foremost, it is imperative to expand horizontally, and make use of tremendously large abandoned areas in order to ameliorate our lifestyle, and to sort out multiple issues stemmed from overpopulation such as traffic jam, noise pollution, and air pollution. Secondly, expanding the housing vertically will do nothing more than exacerbating the hardships that many cities confront Furthermore, the more we expand vertically, the more issues we will suffer in the future. Accordingly, it would be rational and axiomatic to build in the countryside putting in mind that any green areas removed should be compensated via creating other green areas in order to preserve the nature.
To sum up, it is acknowledged that using the countryside to fulfill the need of new houses can incur severe problems to the nature, nevertheless, no eye can miss the dazzling array of benefits of exploiting the countryside to build new homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
For centuries, many countries around the...
^^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... to expand new houses to the countryside . While some people believe that countrys...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that will be tackled in this essay. On one hand, some people argue that the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tically as been done in some cities. Conversely, others including myself emph...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eas in order to preserve the nature. To sum up, it is acknowledged that using...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36686390533 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00796736445 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3734120063 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224789925862 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756897356296 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527498511897 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138476916262 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282408775505 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.