City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?
Today, it is impossible to denied that fact that cities are expanding, however, whether governments should focus on building public transports or more roads for private vehicle access in those bigger cities has sparked a heated debate. In my opinion, I believe that public transport plays a vital role in city’s development, therefore, it should be government’s priority and I will elaborate my point in the following essay.
To begin with, public transport, such as buses, trains and trams provide individuals a healthier and more environmentally friendly option to travel in a large city. As research shows that carbon dioxide emission from vehicles is the major reason contribute to global warming, encouraging citizens take public transport ultimately slows down climate change. Reduced air pollution also suggests a positive impact to local ecology and community. Therefore, building public transportation benefits both the environment and people in the society.
Moreover, using public transport saves a lot of money. In my experiences, when I used to drive to work, I spent a lot of money on parking, insurance and services which was triple the amount of what I spent when only taking trains and buses. In fact, research shows that only families or friends who share private vehicle to work or study benefits from this. Hence, building public transport saves money and is more convenient from individual’s point of view.
In conclusion, although certain groups of people such as elders and disability individuals benefit from using private vehicles, the benefits of extending existing public transport system for majority of people far outweigh its drawbacks. Therefore, governments must look into ways of building public transport in large city instead of building more roads for vehicle owning citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2020-09-15 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-17 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and implications. 77
- The experience of work is more important than having a qualification Do you agree or disagree 92
- The life that a person has depends on the personality, to what extent do you agree? From your own experience and examples. 77
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits or problems 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49823321555 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95191563073 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3998524001 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277831541763 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107371139975 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100286893342 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179443521746 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935817451281 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.