It is much more convenient to watching movie on television or computer than to buy ticket and going to the cinema. In the nearest future, the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is an irrefutable fact that proliferated use of technology has impacted many sectors, and cinema is one of them. It is asserted by some people that in coming years, watching films in theaters would not be preferred choice of audience as it is very convenient to watch movies on television or from online resources. However, I disagree with this notion up to a large extent and intend to discuss my views in subsequent paragraphs.
One the one hand, technology has made very easy and flexible to watch films. As a matter of fact, internet has been transforming world into global village, which further providing people with several options such as laptops and smartphones to enjoy movies from anywhere at any time. For instance, one can see many people engrossed in their electronic gadgets enjoying movies and TV series at bus stops and railways stations, while waiting for their buses and trains respectively. Thus, this type of new trend may refrain some people to visit theaters, especially busy ones.
One the other hand, the prominent reason that cinema would remain in demand because of the unmatchable experience and pleasure watching films in an isolated environment. In fact, decision making factor is not utilization of free time, rather it is a matter of choice. To quote an example, watching movies at home on computer not only can be distracted due to the interference of family members, but also can be annoying due to the lack of sound effects and smaller screen.
To fortify further, going to theaters allows people to spend family time. This is why many families consider it as sort of outing which strengthened the bond between companions. Not only this, shopping malls having cinemas provide opportunity to people to utilize their visit to buy household items and having a lunch or dinner together, which would not be possible, if people keep sticking with their electronic gadgets at home. Therefore, cinema cannot be replaced very easily.
In conclusion, although it is possible to watch movies at home which may impact a small chunk of audience, yet theaters would remain popular in terms of better experience and having quality time with family. Technology and internet sources are addition in entertainment industry, but not replacement of theaters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-21 | Deepa Parekh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | msbawa09 | 78 | view |
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes, haricuts and beauty products to enhance their appearance. Some feel it is a good way while others feel that there are better ways to spend money.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- "Telecommuting" refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology. Telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in 89
- You are unhappy about a plan to make your local airport bigger and increase the number of flights. You live near the airport.Write a letter to your local newspaper. In your letter.1. explain where you live2. describe the problem3. give reasons why you do 89
- Your friend is coming to stay in your neighborhood He has asked some information about the school Describe the school Give your opinion Why his her children would like it 95
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: HAVE_A_BREAKFAST[1]
Message: When we speak of types of meals, the article is not required: 'having lunch'.
Suggestion: having lunch
... their visit to buy household items and having a lunch or dinner together, which would not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08776595745 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71825555322 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0525486033 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127735748709 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405225833083 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326918717617 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760395411921 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389797697767 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.