Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the twentieth century technology play a vital role in the society. Critics have a divergent opinion on the impact of the automation to the society. Some people are believe that computer generate a platform to the students to explore their knowledge and others not. Personally, I am of the convicted that advanced technology is a great opportunity for youngsters to enhance their knowledge. I feel this way that for two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First, The computer provide a great variety of information to the children’s from different resources. In the past, most of the students were used traditional test books to read and that had limited information. However, in the current generation most of the students are using laptops and Tablets to for there studies because it has a infinite resource for every single topic. For example, my uncle daughter, she is studying fourth standard and she use to carry only tablet to school despite the traditional test books. What more, now she using various resources from the internet for her class work.
Second, technology creates people to think innovatively. Most of the schools in the current days are Techno School, which means they are using technology like computers and digital boards to teach the lessons. In addition to that, they are training the students to use computers for their daily work. As a result, they are adapting to the technology and thinking scholarly, even though it is a small topic. For instance, my uncle son who is studying fifth class, he started doing a small project work as a part of their class assignment. He is using internet to gather the information for his work. As a result, he is referring wide variety of references.
In conclusion, although there might be few drawbacks with technology, overall it helps toddlers to think broadly. The internets help to think innovative and update current knowledge to face the real world challenges.
- four day work week 60
- Early twentieth century Chaco construction purpose. the professor refutes the reading claims mentioned in the passage. 70
- human believes on elephant 65
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?television advertising directed towards young adult should not be allowed. Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
- rococo style in art and architecture 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...omation to the society. Some people are believe that computer generate a platform to th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ets to for there studies because it has a infinite resource for every single topi...
^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...she is studying fourth standard and she use to carry only tablet to school despite ...
^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...she is studying fourth standard and she use to carry only tablet to school despite ...
^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...ditional test books. What more, now she using various resources from the internet for...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge to face the real world challenges.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03067484663 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79130991524 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0525423728 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114564383835 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355315241706 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273183202549 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605293391724 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314232393696 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.