Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning a new language, and its corresponidning imapcts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that future aspect of children life can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, cognitive skills can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discoverd the current policies. Thus, beneficail ramification of both developing learning skills and primary school apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a pubnlic arena, online teaching might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of kingergarden is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
to conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of foriegn languages far outweight its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significane of learning system, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | foadihasan | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | arami | 85 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-06 | jagadeeshjimmy | 71 | view |
| 2018-03-06 | maryam2 | 88 | view |
- There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family? 88
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life, for some its relaxation, for some it iscompanion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 85
- more information is available online and library books has no place.agree or disagree? 11
- some people think the universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Some say that in today's world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth-producing careers, such as medicine. Discuss whether you think there is a role in today's changing world for the study of 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve that future aspect of children life can be a plus and I will analyze that th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...notion of this remarkable phenomenon. to conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70042194093 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2335158866 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700421940928 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1836110115 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114556299835 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355066896822 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297620000189 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582972643169 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382405681695 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve that future aspect of children life can be a plus and I will analyze that th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...notion of this remarkable phenomenon. to conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70042194093 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2335158866 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700421940928 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1836110115 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114556299835 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355066896822 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297620000189 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582972643169 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382405681695 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.