Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, educating a child is considered to be one of the major challenging tasks among parents. Some parents see that educating children became easier than before. However, as far as I am concerned, I think that teaching kids is more difficult than it was used to be in past.
With the spread of technology, online games are almost everywhere surrounding children’s environment. Since game do not need special devices, online games can be played at home, school, hospitals, and even in church. Children would download their favorite games on any device such as phone or iPads, later on, they play them publicly or secretly behind their parents pretending that they are studying from their iPad. So, if the parents remove these devices from their kids, kids can still play them anywhere. Furthermore, they can go to any library where they have a game room and then they can play there. Comparing with previous times, online games were not that popular like today. Children used to have a heavy special device for each game. Once their parents decided to do homework and stop playing games, they would remove these devices and the kids would study.
Many school materials require children to have internet access, yet kids might get distracted through the open world of the internet. Now, it is hard to find a kid without an internet accessibility. Several schools ask parents to let their kids have internet access all day. Nevertheless, children would get attracted about all the new game releases advertisement. So, they would download these games and forget about their school projects. As an example, when searching for a history project on google, some game ads such as Game of Duty, Mario Game would pop-up at the searching web page. As a result, kids would be distracted from doing their studies.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that recently, educating kids has become harder than years before. This is not only because of the spread of online games but also because kids can get distracted with games ads as well.
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Us 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...s more difficult than it was used to be in past. With the spread of technology, onl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99120234604 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53546833647 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557184750733 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2888494845 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154989776742 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549155892964 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377468179309 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110344314445 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494097095398 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.