The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to modern technology and human relationships. While it is possible to claim that the new technology destroys the human social contacts, my point of view that the modern auto-pilot artificial mobile technology networks more and more people. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analyzing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad benefits a nation can gain from modern communication such as integrity, message encapsulation, high availability, security, usability, and life quality. For example, “Face book” software networks more billions of people into groups. Therefore, it is taken into account that the new mobile communication is the best for high quality life.
On the other hand, there are many indirect advantages we can gain from modern technology such as instant message sharing, solution for the unemployment and self-confidence. For instance, with the assistance of new functions of communications end users can manage audio, video or documentation. Therefore, it is considered that the modern computers and communication help citizens for more closer relationships.
In conclusion, it is believed that the modern software solutions validate and verify the human needs; therefore, it is an essential function of daily life. In nut shell, it is strongly believed that the governments and professionals should implement policies and procedures for the improvements of this field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-15 | nevermind12 | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | thanuja | 85 | view |
- A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Illiterate of the future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn 77
- Comments on we should be a good listener rather than a good speaker 74
- The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 85
- ‘Environmental problems are too great to be manage by individuals so real change can be achieved at governments level’To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own ex 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...ers and communication help citizens for more closer relationships. In conclusion, it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19493727271 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56378600823 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1820599605 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.545454545 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945568559104 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358631705812 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427955939345 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527653171678 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366542512556 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.