The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
The technology has developed rapidly in this past decades and it has changed the ways how people communicate with each other. But the topic of technology and its impact on communication always creates debate among people; some people believes that technological development has negative effect on the interaction on how people interact while some people think the technological development has positive effect in the people’s relationships. This essay will further elaborate on this topic.
To begin with, in recent years how we interact with people is solely dependent up on the new advent of technology. Each year new kind of device or application is invented which makes the communication with other easy, effective and efficient. For example, the likes of facbook, whatsapp, snapchat, etc has made the conveying of the message exciting and convenient as people can have video chat with other people regardless of on which corner of the globe they are. Therefore, it is safe to say that as new technology is proving to be the boon for the people as it has a positive impact on the relationship.
On the other hand, innovative technology sometime may have negative effect on people’s relationship. Overuse of technology has massive effect on emotional bonding aspect of the relationship. For instance, people who only communicate through the use of digital means may lack psychical or emotional intimacy which is only possible through one to one communication and human touch. Ergo, contemporary technologies can sometime destruct the people’s relationship.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed both negative and positive effect of the technology on people’s relationship. In my opinion, technology can bring people from different place of the world together and create special relationship but over reliance on them could be harmful in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-15 | nevermind12 | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | thanuja | 85 | view |
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 85
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to another political figure science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 77
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43686006826 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16855553873 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3361258624 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427422520741 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164175333744 0.0925447433944 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978291243344 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260713261696 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929795289488 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.