whether or not have to correct others mistakes especially ones of their teacher or meeting leaders
It goes without any shadowing of doubt that by complex function of human beings' brain and existed sophisticated words and information all around the word it is a common occurrence among people to say something wrong. One of the biggest dilemma individuals encountered with is that whether or not have to correct others mistakes especially ones of their teacher or meeting leaders. Many people are of the opinion that it is better either to say nothing during classes or meetings or do that after the end of them. I, personally, subscribe to this idea that we have to correct such a mistake as soon as possible. I think doing so not only do not a wrong information spread among people but also we can save our time.
To begin with, as all we know people are likely to obtain knowledge, information and so forth through word-of-mouth. Considering this, if we allowed a class or meeting's time finish with some misconception or misunderstanding, it would affect not only existed listener but also others connected to them. For instance, I remember from my childhood that my parents participated in an educational meeting. A well-known person from England was the leader of the very meeting. He talked about upbringing methods and provided audiences with some up-to-the-minute psychology knowledge. Unfortunately, he said a strongly influential sentence which was really wrong, parents have to not assign their children in foreign languages until their high schools. Even though there were a few psychologists and teachers among listeners that opposed to him after meeting, but they did not say anything to the leader. This point of view, which was reliable in my parents' eyes, passed through my extended family. Accordingly, most of my cousin and I did not learn any secondary language which firmly impacted on our confidence. If knowledgeable people had corrected the very mistake immediately after it was said, such a spreading of wrong information and following harmful effects would not have happened at all.
Secondly, in this hectic life, time is firmly the most precious property of us. Most of us probably have had at least one experience that we forced to engage to a meeting or class again with the exactly same concept. The prime reason of such a repetition is correction of the wrong information presented in the previous class or meeting. Considering this, we must spend more time than the really required amount of time, we must prepare for it, commute to the place of class or meeting, sit there hours and so more. I think if we noticed to such a mistake during presentation we must make a response right away, since it can prevent the above-mentioned time-wasting. For example, last week, we had a sociology class in which our professor talked about metacognition ability in animals. He brought us with a wrong example about it which changed adversely all the issue. Nevertheless, I had read it via the internet and understood his mistake, but I preferred not to interrupt him during class and say correct one. Today, we received an email that we must participate into his class again. He mentioned that he want to correct some part of his previous lecture. Now, I have to cancel my dance class which will start at the same time with is. I can say with utmost confidence that if I had referred his mistake during the lecture, he would have made correct his wrong soon without needing to another class.
In summary, with taken all this into account, I do believe that as far as passing right information through people and our time are concerned, we must absolutely interrupt the talker and correct him if we understand his mistake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-20 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- the possible meaning and purpose of carved stone balls found in Scotland 80
- whether or not university students must be forced to get history courses regardless to their fields 73
- it is important to know about all events happening aroun the world? 73
- the specific dinosaur lived in North Slope, Edmontosausus, one hundred million years ago 78
- Early birds or night owl 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ma individuals encountered with is that whether or not have to correct others mistakes especia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3031.0 1977.66487455 153% => OK
No of words: 618.0 407.700716846 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90453074434 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98594081286 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84773692183 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490291262136 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 947.7 618.680645161 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6205080723 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32142857143 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217061045764 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628463274456 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119491190298 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140653745627 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101021819881 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.