Life experience is more efficient than books and formal school education.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to conflicts between life experience learnings and procedures in books. While it is possible to claim that tangible experience is the best learning curve, my point of view is that the books and related theories are outweigh the others. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analyzing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages the students and the others can gain from books such as high confidentiality, availability, integrity, portability, usability, quality, efficiency and security. For example, using a book a student can learn most of the past experiences that the author of the book experienced with in few hours. Therefore, it is accepted that the theories on books are the best learning methods for pupils, and after learning they can use them in real life.
On the other hand, books and school education provide a high quality speed of learn and speed of use. For instance, a person can learn well known subject related contain scientifically and methodically with in few hours. Therefore, It is trusted that the books are the standard way to learn, and this educational method is using all over the world.
In conclusion, it is believed that a student should learn using standard materials rather than ad-hoc learning. In conclusion, governments and professionals should push all the schools and universities for this encapsulated method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | vahidmetall | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-07 | xiaojia | 72 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | xiaojia | 77 | view |
- To increase the price of fuel is the only way to reduce air pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree Use your own experience as examples 50
- Comments on we should be a good listener rather than a good speaker 74
- Computer technologies has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinions. 80
- Do you think design of buildings have positive or negative impact. Which way it can effect on work and live?” 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...angible experience is the best learning curve, my point of view is that the books and...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...that the books and related theories are outweigh the others. In this essay, I shall expl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... a book a student can learn most of the past experiences that the author of the book experienced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...is believed that a student should learn using standard materials rather than ad-hoc l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13779527559 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8999931586 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1281009247 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171047704039 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657474250191 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393140675651 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976252951209 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034982480065 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.