Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25 year old is necessary?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to the actions from youngsters below 25-year-old. While it is possible to claim that the maturity comes after 18 years old, my point of view that the real human will be developed after 25 years. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad benefits a nation can gain when removing rights from youngsters for voting and driving such as security, integrity, usability, availability, confidentiality, life quality and encapsulation. For example, recent researches show that the most accidents happened because of the careless driving habits from youngsters. Therefore, it is trusted that the real driving quality attributes developed after 25 years old.
On the other hand, youngsters cannot take quick actions, especially for elections. They cannot take reliable actions. For example, most of the youngsters vote because of the present trend, and those votes should be removed. Therefore, it is accepted that the accurate votes develop after 25 years.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the real thinking power builds after 25 years old. In conclusion, it is believed that professionals and governments should implement a new set of rules and regulations for driving and voting against young people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Life experience is more efficient than books and formal school education. 77
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is theproblem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 80
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be a good member of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 77
- Comments on we should be a good listener rather than a good speaker 74
- Computer technologies has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33187772926 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85835797821 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589519650655 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1629942131 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363600302973 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121681028756 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687672693862 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206775420748 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311880176989 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.