tpo 32
Both the reading and the lecture try to discuss about underwater noises which is heard in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean in the 1960s until the 1980s. Although the reading passage claims that it remainded the submarine crews of frog croaks, the lecture repudiate and states that they don't know what is the exact source of the sounds but there are not submarine.
At first, the reading declares that, the noises were belong to orca whales during a court ship ritual which they live in the areas where the submarines were picking up the strange noises. On the other hand, the lecture asserts that, this theory is highly unlikely because orca whales are live in surface of the area and the noises are not belong to them.
Secondly, the reading presents that, the sounds were caused by giant squid which they live deep in the ocean and they are able to make sounds. The professor, on the other hand, mentiones that the sounds disappear in 1980s but the gain squid should live after the date in the ocean.
Finally, the reading asserts that, the strange sounds can be from some military technology. But the lecture mentiones that, it is not because if they were the sounds it should be changed in diraction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... lecture repudiate and states that they dont know what is the exact source of the so...
^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... reading declares that, the noises were belong to orca whales during a court ship ritu...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...face of the area and the noises are not belong to them. Secondly, the reading present...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...nd, mentiones that the sounds disappear in 1980s but the gain squid should live after th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70422535211 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10519279799 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5750512645 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381868495117 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172560910656 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837481742885 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23201448076 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314250454941 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.