Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Provide relevant examples from you own experience.
<p style="white-space: normal;">The internet and technology have not left a single aspect of our lives untouched, especially the way we access music and films, which are now available to watch and listen from anywhere. In my opinion, if we examine its impact on the individual and on society as a whole, it is a mixed blessing, whose effectiveness lies only in the way users used it.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">To begin with, cost-free multimedia has changed the face of the entertainment industry by its recent advancements. When TV used to be the only source of relaxation, it had several limitations, people not only has to spend a lot of money but also was bounded to sit in front of it. On the other hand, online content comes at very free of cost and excellent quality, and provide the platform to for new artists to show their potential, which was extremely difficult in the past and has revolutionized the whole film industry. For example, YouTubers are enjoying popularity all over the world as a result of diverse online free market. Thus, viewer and the artists both are benefitted by the free online films and music.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">However, it is not as lucrative as it sounds because it has some serious implication on our daily lives. Due to free access, people started spending a lot of their time watching movies, which has impacted their productivity and health by making them more lethargic. For example, on an average, people spend at least 2 hours on their devices to watch music and movie videos. In addition, the number of piracy incidents is increasing exponentially, which has become a nightmare for lawmakers, and for producers who have invested their fortune in the production of those films. Thus, the popularity of online movies is dangerous for the individual as well as society.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">In conclusion, people have to learn about their responsibility to minimize the negative impact of continuous exploitation of free movies. For authorities, .it is time to strengthen the laws to protect the privacy of free online content.</p>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-24 | parisairam | 56 | view |
2018-12-24 | parisairam | 56 | view |
2018-12-24 | parisairam | 56 | view |
2018-12-24 | parisairam | 56 | view |
2018-12-24 | parisairam | 73 | view |
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 56
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 56
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 56
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 73
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2067, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...itation of free movies. For authorities, .it is time to strengthen the laws to pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, as to, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30116959064 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81025567231 2.80592935109 136% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7398945551 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.818181818 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 7.06120827912 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134142595131 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551597825729 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269570151099 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134142595131 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.