the graph below shows the number of subscribers paying for fixed telephone line and mobile phone network in Africa between 1994 to 2007
The given graph illustrates the number of viewers who paid to use fixed telephone line and cellphone network in Africa from 1994 to 2007, the period of 13 years.
Overall, it is clear to see that subscribers of both series 1 and series 3 rose over the period. while the number of people who paid for fixed telephone line increased steadily over 13 years, there was a dramatically growth in those who paid for mobile phone network.
In 1994, over 2 million people used fixed telephone network which is double more than the figures of mobile phone line. This number gradually rose to nearly 3 million people in 2002. The number of viewers of cell phone network witnessed a parallel trend until 2000, there was a significant increase to the same figure of 3 million in 2002
After that year, the number of subscriber to mobile phone line continued to growth dramatically and reached the peak at total of 8 million in 2007. On the other hand, the number of those who paid for fixed line saw a slow rise in comparison, reaching nearly 4 million viewers in 2007.
- in many countries people can eat a wide variety of food today As a result they eat food from other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh disadvantages 76
- some people argue that countries should have a moral obligation to help each other on the other hand some people argue that a large amount of aid money does not reach the poor of the world Discuss both view and give your opinion 72
- some groups such as poor people and people from rural areas find it is difficult to access the university education University should make it easy for the student coming from the rural areas to get an access to the university 74
- : some people think it is more important to plant trees in open areas in towns and cities than to improve more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Topic 23 : nowadays a large amount of advertising aiming at children should be banned because of its negative effects. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who paid to use fixed telephone line and cellphone network in Africa from 1994 t...
^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne and cellphone network in Africa from 1994 to 2007, the period of 13 years. ...
^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...es 1 and series 3 rose over the period. while the number of people who paid for fixed...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...eased steadily over 13 years, there was a dramatically growth in those who paid for mobile phone netw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72486772487 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41702248737 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6602792195 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396893151388 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188562221028 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103442934483 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258141337831 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419261143081 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.